The families’ testimonies reveal disturbing themes of indifference and neglect on the part of the police in their investigations following a domestic abuse related suicide.
Two related issues have clearly emerged: a failure to investigate wider histories of domestic abuse because of a failure to recognise underlying dynamics of abuse and coercive control; and a consequent failure to conduct a thorough investigation of a death as a potential homicide, leading to a failure to consider charges of manslaughter where appropriate.
At best families, of both female and male victims, may see charges of coercive control brought against the abusers, often belatedly following inquests: charges which fail to reflect the gravity of the offending behaviour and its impact on victims.
Families often have to wait for years for the state to account for such failures, and it is usually too late by then to put them right.
The real issue is not any lack of police powers or gaps in the criminal law. As acknowledged by the National Police Chiefs’ Council lead on domestic abuse - Assistant Commissioner Louisa Rolfe of the Metropolitan Police - investigators miss obvious patterns of coercive and controlling behaviour in too many cases: “It’s very clear that there is more for us to do, to be really curious about what’s happened, to ensure that evidence at the scene of an incident is very thoroughly captured and explored.”
This recognition of the prevalence of police mishandling of domestic abuse-related suicides is welcome but it is not enough. Lessons learnt from countless Domestic Homicide Reviews tell us that the failure of the police to be ‘ really curious about what’s happened’ is not the whole problem. Rather, we are faced with serious structural and systemic issues around responses to domestic abuse and coercive control.